DeepSeek: R1 vs Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek: R1 and Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.
Verdict
strong confidenceQwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking leads overall
Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking leads in context window and capabilities and max output, making it the stronger choice for most workflows. DeepSeek: R1 remains a solid alternative depending on your specific needs.
Best for with DeepSeek: R1
Best for with Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Side-by-side
Technical specifications
| DeepSeek: R1 | Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Qwen |
| Input price | $0.70/M | $0.26/M |
| Output price | $3/M | $3/M |
| Context window | 64K | 131K |
| Max output | 16K | 33K |
| Capabilities | Tool useReasoning | Tool useVisionReasoning |
| Released | Jan 20, 2025 | Sep 23, 2025 |
Scoring breakdown
How each dimension compares
Price
DeepSeek: R1
$3/M tokens
Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
$3/M tokens
Context Window
Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking leadsDeepSeek: R1
64K tokens
Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
131K tokens
Capabilities
Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking leadsDeepSeek: R1
2/4
Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
3/4
Max Output
Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking leadsDeepSeek: R1
16K tokens
Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
33K tokens
Recency
DeepSeek: R1
Jan 2025
Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Sep 2025
Related comparisons
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DeepSeek: R1
mid tier · Cross-provider
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
mid tier · Cross-provider
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek: R1
mid tier · Cross-provider
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
mid tier · Cross-provider