Skip to content
AI Viewer
Model comparison Synced Apr 6, 2026

DeepSeek: R1 vs Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek: R1 and Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.

Verdict

strong confidence

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking leads overall

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking leads in context window and capabilities and max output, making it the stronger choice for most workflows. DeepSeek: R1 remains a solid alternative depending on your specific needs.

Best for with DeepSeek: R1

No clear advantages identified

Best for with Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Long document processingMulti-modal tasksLong-form content generation

Side-by-side

Technical specifications

DeepSeek: R1 Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Provider DeepSeek Qwen
Input price $0.70/M $0.26/M
Output price $3/M $3/M
Context window 64K 131K
Max output 16K 33K
Capabilities
Tool useReasoning
Tool useVisionReasoning
Released Jan 20, 2025 Sep 23, 2025

Scoring breakdown

How each dimension compares

Price

DeepSeek: R1

$3/M tokens

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

$3/M tokens

Context Window

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking leads

DeepSeek: R1

64K tokens

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

131K tokens

Capabilities

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking leads

DeepSeek: R1

2/4

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

3/4

Max Output

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking leads

DeepSeek: R1

16K tokens

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

33K tokens

Recency

DeepSeek: R1

Jan 2025

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Sep 2025

Related comparisons