Skip to content
AI Viewer
Model comparison Synced Apr 6, 2026

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Side-by-side comparison of Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku and Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.

Verdict

strong confidence

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking leads overall

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking leads in price and capabilities and max output, making it the stronger choice for most workflows. Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku remains competitive with advantages in context window.

Best for with Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku

Long document processing

Best for with Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Budget-conscious workflowsMulti-modal tasksLong-form content generation

Side-by-side

Technical specifications

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Provider Anthropic Qwen
Input price $0.80/M $0.26/M
Output price $4/M $3/M
Context window 200K 131K
Max output 8K 33K
Capabilities
Tool useVision
Tool useVisionReasoning
Released Nov 3, 2024 Sep 23, 2025

Scoring breakdown

How each dimension compares

Price

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking leads

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku

$4/M tokens

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

$3/M tokens

Context Window

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku

200K tokens

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

131K tokens

Capabilities

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking leads

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku

2/4

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

3/4

Max Output

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking leads

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku

8K tokens

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

33K tokens

Recency

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku

Nov 2024

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Sep 2025

Related comparisons