Skip to content
AI Viewer
Model comparison Synced Apr 6, 2026

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Side-by-side comparison of Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.

Verdict

strong confidence

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 leads overall

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 leads in context window and max output, making it the stronger choice for most workflows. Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking remains competitive with advantages in price.

Best for with Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5

Long document processingLong-form content generation

Best for with Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Budget-conscious workflows

Side-by-side

Technical specifications

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Provider Anthropic Qwen
Input price $1/M $0.26/M
Output price $5/M $3/M
Context window 200K 131K
Max output 64K 33K
Capabilities
Tool useVisionReasoning
Tool useVisionReasoning
Released Oct 15, 2025 Sep 23, 2025

Scoring breakdown

How each dimension compares

Price

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking leads

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5

$5/M tokens

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

$3/M tokens

Context Window

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5

200K tokens

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

131K tokens

Capabilities

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5

3/4

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

3/4

Max Output

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5

64K tokens

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

33K tokens

Recency

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5

Oct 2025

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Sep 2025

Related comparisons