Skip to content
AI Viewer
Model comparison Synced Apr 6, 2026

DeepSeek: R1 0528 vs Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek: R1 0528 and Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.

Verdict

moderate confidence

DeepSeek: R1 0528 leads overall

DeepSeek: R1 0528 leads in price and context window and max output, making it the stronger choice for most workflows. Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking remains competitive with advantages in capabilities.

Best for with DeepSeek: R1 0528

Budget-conscious workflowsLong document processingLong-form content generation

Best for with Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Multi-modal tasks

Side-by-side

Technical specifications

DeepSeek: R1 0528 Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Provider DeepSeek Qwen
Input price $0.45/M $0.26/M
Output price $2/M $3/M
Context window 164K 131K
Max output 66K 33K
Capabilities
Tool useReasoning
Tool useVisionReasoning
Released May 28, 2025 Sep 23, 2025

Scoring breakdown

How each dimension compares

Price

DeepSeek: R1 0528 leads

DeepSeek: R1 0528

$2/M tokens

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

$3/M tokens

Context Window

DeepSeek: R1 0528 leads

DeepSeek: R1 0528

164K tokens

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

131K tokens

Capabilities

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking leads

DeepSeek: R1 0528

2/4

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

3/4

Max Output

DeepSeek: R1 0528 leads

DeepSeek: R1 0528

66K tokens

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

33K tokens

Recency

DeepSeek: R1 0528

May 2025

Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Sep 2025

Related comparisons