DeepSeek: R1 0528 vs Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
Side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek: R1 0528 and Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.
Verdict
strong confidenceDeepSeek: R1 0528 leads overall
DeepSeek: R1 0528 leads in price and max output, making it the stronger choice for most workflows. Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking remains competitive with advantages in context window.
Best for with DeepSeek: R1 0528
Best for with Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
Side-by-side
Technical specifications
| DeepSeek: R1 0528 | Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Qwen |
| Input price | $0.45/M | $0.78/M |
| Output price | $2/M | $4/M |
| Context window | 164K | 262K |
| Max output | 66K | 33K |
| Capabilities | Tool useReasoning | Tool useReasoning |
| Released | May 28, 2025 | Feb 9, 2026 |
Scoring breakdown
How each dimension compares
Price
DeepSeek: R1 0528 leadsDeepSeek: R1 0528
$2/M tokens
Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
$4/M tokens
Context Window
Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking leadsDeepSeek: R1 0528
164K tokens
Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
262K tokens
Capabilities
DeepSeek: R1 0528
2/4
Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
2/4
Max Output
DeepSeek: R1 0528 leadsDeepSeek: R1 0528
66K tokens
Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
33K tokens
Recency
DeepSeek: R1 0528
May 2025
Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
Feb 2026
Related comparisons
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DeepSeek: R1 0528
mid tier · Cross-provider
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
mid tier · Cross-provider
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek: R1 0528
mid tier · Cross-provider
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
mid tier · Cross-provider