Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
Side-by-side comparison of Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku and Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.
Verdict
moderate confidenceQwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking leads overall
Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking leads in context window and max output, making it the stronger choice for most workflows. Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku remains a solid alternative depending on your specific needs.
Best for with Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku
Best for with Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
Side-by-side
Technical specifications
| Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku | Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Qwen |
| Input price | $0.80/M | $0.78/M |
| Output price | $4/M | $4/M |
| Context window | 200K | 262K |
| Max output | 8K | 33K |
| Capabilities | Tool useVision | Tool useReasoning |
| Released | Nov 3, 2024 | Feb 9, 2026 |
Scoring breakdown
How each dimension compares
Price
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku
$4/M tokens
Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
$4/M tokens
Context Window
Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking leadsAnthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku
200K tokens
Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
262K tokens
Capabilities
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku
2/4
Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
2/4
Max Output
Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking leadsAnthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku
8K tokens
Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
33K tokens
Recency
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku
Nov 2024
Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
Feb 2026
Related comparisons
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DeepSeek: R1
mid tier · Cross-provider
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DeepSeek: R1 0528
mid tier · Cross-provider
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash
mid tier · Cross-provider
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
mid tier · Cross-provider