Skip to content
AI Viewer
Model comparison Synced Apr 6, 2026

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking

Side-by-side comparison of Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.

Verdict

strong confidence

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking are closely matched across pricing, context, and capabilities. Your choice depends on workflow-specific factors like provider ecosystem preference and existing integrations.

Best for with Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5

Multi-modal tasksLong-form content generation

Best for with Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking

Budget-conscious workflowsLong document processing

Side-by-side

Technical specifications

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
Provider Anthropic Qwen
Input price $1/M $0.78/M
Output price $5/M $4/M
Context window 200K 262K
Max output 64K 33K
Capabilities
Tool useVisionReasoning
Tool useReasoning
Released Oct 15, 2025 Feb 9, 2026

Scoring breakdown

How each dimension compares

Price

Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking leads

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5

$5/M tokens

Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking

$4/M tokens

Context Window

Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking leads

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5

200K tokens

Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking

262K tokens

Capabilities

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5

3/4

Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking

2/4

Max Output

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5

64K tokens

Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking

33K tokens

Recency

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5

Oct 2025

Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking

Feb 2026

Related comparisons