Skip to content
AI Viewer
Model comparison Synced Apr 6, 2026

Google: Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507

Side-by-side comparison of Google: Gemma 3 27B and Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.

Verdict

strong confidence

Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 leads overall

Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 leads in context window and max output, making it the stronger choice for most workflows. Google: Gemma 3 27B remains competitive with advantages in price.

Best for with Google: Gemma 3 27B

Budget-conscious workflows

Best for with Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507

Long document processingLong-form content generation

Side-by-side

Technical specifications

Google: Gemma 3 27B Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Provider Google Qwen
Input price $0.08/M $0.09/M
Output price $0.16/M $0.30/M
Context window 131K 262K
Max output 16K 262K
Capabilities
Vision
Tool use
Released Mar 12, 2025 Jul 29, 2025

Scoring breakdown

How each dimension compares

Price

Google: Gemma 3 27B leads

Google: Gemma 3 27B

$0.16/M tokens

Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507

$0.30/M tokens

Context Window

Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 leads

Google: Gemma 3 27B

131K tokens

Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507

262K tokens

Capabilities

Google: Gemma 3 27B

1/4

Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507

1/4

Max Output

Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 leads

Google: Gemma 3 27B

16K tokens

Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507

262K tokens

Recency

Google: Gemma 3 27B

Mar 2025

Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507

Jul 2025

Related comparisons