Skip to content
AI Viewer
Model comparison Synced Apr 6, 2026

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 vs Google: Gemma 3 27B

Side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 and Google: Gemma 3 27B. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.

Verdict

strong confidence

Google: Gemma 3 27B leads overall

Google: Gemma 3 27B leads in price and context window and max output, making it the stronger choice for most workflows. DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 remains competitive with advantages in capabilities.

Best for with DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1

Multi-modal tasks

Best for with Google: Gemma 3 27B

Budget-conscious workflowsLong document processingLong-form content generation

Side-by-side

Technical specifications

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Google: Gemma 3 27B
Provider DeepSeek Google
Input price $0.15/M $0.08/M
Output price $0.75/M $0.16/M
Context window 33K 131K
Max output 7K 16K
Capabilities
Tool useReasoning
Vision
Released Aug 21, 2025 Mar 12, 2025

Scoring breakdown

How each dimension compares

Price

Google: Gemma 3 27B leads

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1

$0.75/M tokens

Google: Gemma 3 27B

$0.16/M tokens

Context Window

Google: Gemma 3 27B leads

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1

33K tokens

Google: Gemma 3 27B

131K tokens

Capabilities

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 leads

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1

2/4

Google: Gemma 3 27B

1/4

Max Output

Google: Gemma 3 27B leads

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1

7K tokens

Google: Gemma 3 27B

16K tokens

Recency

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1

Aug 2025

Google: Gemma 3 27B

Mar 2025

Related comparisons