Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Side-by-side comparison of Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.
Verdict
moderate confidenceGoogle: Gemini 2.5 Flash leads overall
Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash leads in context window and capabilities, making it the stronger choice for most workflows. Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B remains competitive with advantages in price.
Best for with Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash
Best for with Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Side-by-side
Technical specifications
| Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash | Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Qwen | |
| Input price | $0.30/M | $0.39/M |
| Output price | $3/M | $2/M |
| Context window | 1.0M | 262K |
| Max output | 66K | 66K |
| Capabilities | Tool useVisionAudioReasoning | Tool useVisionReasoning |
| Released | Jun 17, 2025 | Feb 16, 2026 |
Scoring breakdown
How each dimension compares
Price
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B leadsGoogle: Gemini 2.5 Flash
$3/M tokens
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
$2/M tokens
Context Window
Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash leadsGoogle: Gemini 2.5 Flash
1.0M tokens
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
262K tokens
Capabilities
Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash leadsGoogle: Gemini 2.5 Flash
4/4
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
3/4
Max Output
Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash
66K tokens
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
66K tokens
Recency
Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash
Jun 2025
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Feb 2026
Related comparisons
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash
mid tier · Cross-provider
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
mid tier · Cross-provider
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash
mid tier · Cross-provider
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
mid tier · Cross-provider