Skip to content
AI Viewer
Model comparison Synced Apr 6, 2026

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Side-by-side comparison of Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.

Verdict

moderate confidence

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B leads overall

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B leads in price and context window, making it the stronger choice for most workflows. Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 remains a solid alternative depending on your specific needs.

Best for with Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5

No clear advantages identified

Best for with Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Budget-conscious workflowsLong document processing

Side-by-side

Technical specifications

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Provider Anthropic Qwen
Input price $1/M $0.39/M
Output price $5/M $2/M
Context window 200K 262K
Max output 64K 66K
Capabilities
Tool useVisionReasoning
Tool useVisionReasoning
Released Oct 15, 2025 Feb 16, 2026

Scoring breakdown

How each dimension compares

Price

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B leads

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5

$5/M tokens

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

$2/M tokens

Context Window

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B leads

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5

200K tokens

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

262K tokens

Capabilities

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5

3/4

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

3/4

Max Output

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5

64K tokens

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

66K tokens

Recency

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5

Oct 2025

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Feb 2026

Related comparisons