Skip to content
AI Viewer
Model comparison Synced Apr 6, 2026

DeepSeek: R1 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek: R1 and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.

Verdict

strong confidence

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B leads overall

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B leads in price and context window and capabilities and max output, making it the stronger choice for most workflows. DeepSeek: R1 remains a solid alternative depending on your specific needs.

Best for with DeepSeek: R1

No clear advantages identified

Best for with Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Long document processingMulti-modal tasksLong-form content generation

Side-by-side

Technical specifications

DeepSeek: R1 Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Provider DeepSeek Qwen
Input price $0.70/M $0.39/M
Output price $3/M $2/M
Context window 64K 262K
Max output 16K 66K
Capabilities
Tool useReasoning
Tool useVisionReasoning
Released Jan 20, 2025 Feb 16, 2026
View DeepSeek: R1 profile View Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B profile

Scoring breakdown

How each dimension compares

Price

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B leads

DeepSeek: R1

$3/M tokens

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

$2/M tokens

Context Window

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B leads

DeepSeek: R1

64K tokens

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

262K tokens

Capabilities

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B leads

DeepSeek: R1

2/4

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

3/4

Max Output

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B leads

DeepSeek: R1

16K tokens

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

66K tokens

Recency

DeepSeek: R1

Jan 2025

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Feb 2026

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DeepSeek: R1

mid tier · Cross-provider

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

mid tier · Cross-provider

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek: R1

mid tier · Cross-provider

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

mid tier · Cross-provider

Get a personalized recommendation All comparisons