Skip to content
AI Viewer
Model comparison Synced Apr 6, 2026

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen: Qwen-Max

Side-by-side comparison of Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen: Qwen-Max. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.

Verdict

strong confidence

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 leads overall

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 leads in context window and capabilities and max output, making it the stronger choice for most workflows. Qwen: Qwen-Max remains competitive with advantages in price.

Best for with Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5

Long document processingMulti-modal tasksLong-form content generation

Best for with Qwen: Qwen-Max

Budget-conscious workflows

Side-by-side

Technical specifications

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 Qwen: Qwen-Max
Provider Anthropic Qwen
Input price $1/M $1/M
Output price $5/M $4/M
Context window 200K 33K
Max output 64K 8K
Capabilities
Tool useVisionReasoning
Tool use
Released Oct 15, 2025 Feb 1, 2025

Scoring breakdown

How each dimension compares

Price

Qwen: Qwen-Max leads

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5

$5/M tokens

Qwen: Qwen-Max

$4/M tokens

Context Window

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5

200K tokens

Qwen: Qwen-Max

33K tokens

Capabilities

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5

3/4

Qwen: Qwen-Max

1/4

Max Output

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 leads

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5

64K tokens

Qwen: Qwen-Max

8K tokens

Recency

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5

Oct 2025

Qwen: Qwen-Max

Feb 2025

Related comparisons