Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Qwen: Qwen-Max
Side-by-side comparison of Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku and Qwen: Qwen-Max. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.
Verdict
strong confidenceAnthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku leads overall
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku leads in context window and capabilities, making it the stronger choice for most workflows. Qwen: Qwen-Max remains a solid alternative depending on your specific needs.
Best for with Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku
Best for with Qwen: Qwen-Max
Side-by-side
Technical specifications
| Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku | Qwen: Qwen-Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Qwen |
| Input price | $0.80/M | $1/M |
| Output price | $4/M | $4/M |
| Context window | 200K | 33K |
| Max output | 8K | 8K |
| Capabilities | Tool useVision | Tool use |
| Released | Nov 3, 2024 | Feb 1, 2025 |
Scoring breakdown
How each dimension compares
Price
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku
$4/M tokens
Qwen: Qwen-Max
$4/M tokens
Context Window
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku leadsAnthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku
200K tokens
Qwen: Qwen-Max
33K tokens
Capabilities
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku leadsAnthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku
2/4
Qwen: Qwen-Max
1/4
Max Output
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku
8K tokens
Qwen: Qwen-Max
8K tokens
Recency
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku
Nov 2024
Qwen: Qwen-Max
Feb 2025
Related comparisons
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DeepSeek: R1
mid tier · Cross-provider
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DeepSeek: R1 0528
mid tier · Cross-provider
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash
mid tier · Cross-provider
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
mid tier · Cross-provider