Skip to content
AI Viewer
Model comparison Synced Apr 6, 2026

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) vs OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex

Side-by-side comparison of Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) and OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.

Verdict

moderate confidence

OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex leads overall

OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex leads in price and context window and max output, making it the stronger choice for most workflows. Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) remains a solid alternative depending on your specific needs.

Best for with Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)

No clear advantages identified

Best for with OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex

Long document processingLong-form content generation

Side-by-side

Technical specifications

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex
Provider Anthropic OpenAI
Input price $3/M $2/M
Output price $15/M $14/M
Context window 200K 400K
Max output 64K 128K
Capabilities
Tool useVisionReasoning
Tool useVisionReasoning
Released Feb 24, 2025 Feb 24, 2026

Scoring breakdown

How each dimension compares

Price

OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex leads

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)

$15/M tokens

OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex

$14/M tokens

Context Window

OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex leads

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)

200K tokens

OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex

400K tokens

Capabilities

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)

3/4

OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex

3/4

Max Output

OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex leads

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)

64K tokens

OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex

128K tokens

Recency

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)

Feb 2025

OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex

Feb 2026

Related comparisons