Skip to content
AI Viewer
Model comparison Synced Apr 5, 2026

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex

Side-by-side comparison of Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet and OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.

Verdict

strong confidence

OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex leads overall

OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex leads in price and context window and capabilities and max output, making it the stronger choice for most workflows. Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet remains a solid alternative depending on your specific needs.

Best for with Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet

No clear advantages identified

Best for with OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex

Budget-conscious workflowsLong document processingMulti-modal tasksLong-form content generation

Side-by-side

Technical specifications

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex
Provider Anthropic OpenAI
Input price $6/M $2/M
Output price $30/M $14/M
Context window 200K 400K
Max output 8K 128K
Capabilities
Tool useVision
Tool useVisionReasoning
Released Oct 21, 2024 Feb 24, 2026

Scoring breakdown

How each dimension compares

Price

OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex leads

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet

$30/M tokens

OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex

$14/M tokens

Context Window

OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex leads

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet

200K tokens

OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex

400K tokens

Capabilities

OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex leads

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet

2/4

OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex

3/4

Max Output

OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex leads

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet

8K tokens

OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex

128K tokens

Recency

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Oct 2024

OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex

Feb 2026

Related comparisons