Skip to content
AI Viewer
Model comparison Synced Mar 10, 2026

Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Side-by-side comparison of Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.

Verdict

marginal confidence

Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B leads overall

Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B leads in price, making it the stronger choice for most workflows. Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B remains a solid alternative depending on your specific needs.

Best for with Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Budget-conscious workflows

Best for with Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

No clear advantages identified

Side-by-side

Technical specifications

Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Provider Qwen Qwen
Input price $0.26/M $0.39/M
Output price $2/M $2/M
Context window 262K 262K
Max output 66K 66K
Capabilities
Tool useVisionReasoning
Tool useVisionReasoning
Released Feb 25, 2026 Feb 16, 2026

Scoring breakdown

How each dimension compares

Price

Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B leads

Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

$2/M tokens

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

$2/M tokens

Context Window

Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

262K tokens

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

262K tokens

Capabilities

Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

3/4

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

3/4

Max Output

Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

66K tokens

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

66K tokens

Recency

Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Feb 2026

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Feb 2026

Related comparisons