Model comparison Synced Apr 6, 2026

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen: Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)

Side-by-side comparison of Google: Gemma 4 31B and Qwen: Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto). Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.

Verdict

strong confidence

Google: Gemma 4 31B leads overall

Google: Gemma 4 31B leads in price and capabilities and max output, making it the stronger choice for most workflows. Qwen: Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) remains a solid alternative depending on your specific needs.

Best for with Google: Gemma 4 31B

Budget-conscious workflowsMulti-modal tasksLong-form content generation

Best for with Qwen: Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)

No clear advantages identified

Side-by-side

Technical specifications

	Google: Gemma 4 31B	Qwen: Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Provider	Google	Qwen
Input price	$0.14/M	$0.22/M
Output price	$0.40/M	$2/M
Context window	262K	262K
Max output	131K	66K
Capabilities	Tool useVisionReasoning	Tool use
Released	Apr 2, 2026	Jul 22, 2025

View Google: Gemma 4 31B profile View Qwen: Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) profile

Scoring breakdown

How each dimension compares

Price

Google: Gemma 4 31B leads

Google: Gemma 4 31B

$0.40/M tokens