Skip to content
AI Viewer
Model comparison Synced Apr 6, 2026

Google: Gemma 3 4B vs Qwen: Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Side-by-side comparison of Google: Gemma 3 4B and Qwen: Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.

Verdict

strong confidence

Google: Gemma 3 4B leads overall

Google: Gemma 3 4B leads in price and context window, making it the stronger choice for most workflows. Qwen: Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct remains competitive with advantages in max output.

Best for with Google: Gemma 3 4B

Budget-conscious workflowsLong document processing

Best for with Qwen: Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Long-form content generation

Side-by-side

Technical specifications

Google: Gemma 3 4B Qwen: Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Provider Google Qwen
Input price $0.04/M $0.80/M
Output price $0.08/M $0.80/M
Context window 131K 33K
Max output N/A 33K
Capabilities
Vision
Vision
Released Mar 13, 2025 Feb 1, 2025

Scoring breakdown

How each dimension compares

Price

Google: Gemma 3 4B leads

Google: Gemma 3 4B

$0.08/M tokens

Qwen: Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

$0.80/M tokens

Context Window

Google: Gemma 3 4B leads

Google: Gemma 3 4B

131K tokens

Qwen: Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

33K tokens

Capabilities

Google: Gemma 3 4B

1/4

Qwen: Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

1/4

Max Output

Qwen: Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct leads

Google: Gemma 3 4B

N/A

Qwen: Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

33K tokens

Recency

Google: Gemma 3 4B

Mar 2025

Qwen: Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Feb 2025

Related comparisons