Skip to content
AI Viewer
Model comparison Synced Apr 6, 2026

Google: Gemma 3 4B (free) vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Side-by-side comparison of Google: Gemma 3 4B (free) and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.

Verdict

strong confidence

Google: Gemma 3 4B (free) leads overall

Google: Gemma 3 4B (free) leads in price and capabilities and max output, making it the stronger choice for most workflows. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct remains a solid alternative depending on your specific needs.

Best for with Google: Gemma 3 4B (free)

Budget-conscious workflowsMulti-modal tasksLong-form content generation

Best for with Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

No clear advantages identified

Side-by-side

Technical specifications

Google: Gemma 3 4B (free) Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Provider Google Qwen
Input price $0.00/M $0.66/M
Output price $0.00/M $1/M
Context window 33K 33K
Max output 8K N/A
Capabilities
Vision
Released Mar 13, 2025 Nov 11, 2024

Scoring breakdown

How each dimension compares

Price

Google: Gemma 3 4B (free) leads

Google: Gemma 3 4B (free)

$0.00/M tokens

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

$1/M tokens

Context Window

Google: Gemma 3 4B (free)

33K tokens

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

33K tokens

Capabilities

Google: Gemma 3 4B (free) leads

Google: Gemma 3 4B (free)

1/4

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

0/4

Max Output

Google: Gemma 3 4B (free) leads

Google: Gemma 3 4B (free)

8K tokens

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

N/A

Recency

Google: Gemma 3 4B (free)

Mar 2025

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Nov 2024

Related comparisons