Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs OpenAI: o3
Side-by-side comparison of Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) and OpenAI: o3. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.
Verdict
strong confidenceOpenAI: o3 leads overall
OpenAI: o3 leads in context window and capabilities and max output, making it the stronger choice for most workflows. Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) remains competitive with advantages in price.
Best for with Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
Best for with OpenAI: o3
Side-by-side
Technical specifications
| Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) | OpenAI: o3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Input price | $0.30/M | $2/M |
| Output price | $3/M | $8/M |
| Context window | 33K | 200K |
| Max output | 33K | 100K |
| Capabilities | Vision | Tool useVisionReasoning |
| Released | Oct 7, 2025 | Apr 16, 2025 |
Scoring breakdown
How each dimension compares
Price
Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) leadsGoogle: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
$3/M tokens
OpenAI: o3
$8/M tokens
Context Window
OpenAI: o3 leadsGoogle: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
33K tokens
OpenAI: o3
200K tokens
Capabilities
OpenAI: o3 leadsGoogle: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
1/4
OpenAI: o3
3/4
Max Output
OpenAI: o3 leadsGoogle: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
33K tokens
OpenAI: o3
100K tokens
Recency
Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
Oct 2025
OpenAI: o3
Apr 2025
Related comparisons
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
mid tier · Cross-provider
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs OpenAI: o3
mid tier · Cross-provider
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
mid tier · Cross-provider
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs OpenAI: o3
mid tier · Cross-provider