Skip to content
AI Viewer
Model comparison Synced Mar 10, 2026

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (exacto) vs Meta: Llama 4 Scout

Side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (exacto) and Meta: Llama 4 Scout. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.

Verdict

strong confidence

Meta: Llama 4 Scout leads overall

Meta: Llama 4 Scout leads in price and context window and max output, making it the stronger choice for most workflows. DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (exacto) remains a solid alternative depending on your specific needs.

Best for with DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (exacto)

No clear advantages identified

Best for with Meta: Llama 4 Scout

Budget-conscious workflowsLong document processingLong-form content generation

Side-by-side

Technical specifications

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (exacto) Meta: Llama 4 Scout
Provider DeepSeek Meta
Input price $0.21/M $0.08/M
Output price $0.79/M $0.30/M
Context window 164K 328K
Max output N/A 16K
Capabilities
Tool useReasoning
Tool useVision
Released Sep 22, 2025 Apr 5, 2025

Scoring breakdown

How each dimension compares

Price

Meta: Llama 4 Scout leads

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (exacto)

$0.79/M tokens

Meta: Llama 4 Scout

$0.30/M tokens

Context Window

Meta: Llama 4 Scout leads

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (exacto)

164K tokens

Meta: Llama 4 Scout

328K tokens

Capabilities

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (exacto)

2/4

Meta: Llama 4 Scout

2/4

Max Output

Meta: Llama 4 Scout leads

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (exacto)

N/A

Meta: Llama 4 Scout

16K tokens

Recency

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (exacto)

Sep 2025

Meta: Llama 4 Scout

Apr 2025

Related comparisons