Skip to content
AI Viewer
Model comparison Synced Apr 6, 2026

DeepSeek: R1 vs DeepSeek: R1 0528

Side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek: R1 and DeepSeek: R1 0528. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.

Verdict

strong confidence

DeepSeek: R1 0528 leads overall

DeepSeek: R1 0528 leads in price and context window and max output, making it the stronger choice for most workflows. DeepSeek: R1 remains a solid alternative depending on your specific needs.

Best for with DeepSeek: R1

No clear advantages identified

Best for with DeepSeek: R1 0528

Budget-conscious workflowsLong document processingLong-form content generation

Side-by-side

Technical specifications

DeepSeek: R1 DeepSeek: R1 0528
Provider DeepSeek DeepSeek
Input price $0.70/M $0.45/M
Output price $3/M $2/M
Context window 64K 164K
Max output 16K 66K
Capabilities
Tool useReasoning
Tool useReasoning
Released Jan 20, 2025 May 28, 2025
View DeepSeek: R1 profile View DeepSeek: R1 0528 profile

Scoring breakdown

How each dimension compares

Price

DeepSeek: R1 0528 leads

DeepSeek: R1

$3/M tokens

DeepSeek: R1 0528

$2/M tokens

Context Window

DeepSeek: R1 0528 leads

DeepSeek: R1

64K tokens

DeepSeek: R1 0528

164K tokens

Capabilities

DeepSeek: R1

2/4

DeepSeek: R1 0528

2/4

Max Output

DeepSeek: R1 0528 leads

DeepSeek: R1

16K tokens

DeepSeek: R1 0528

66K tokens

Recency

DeepSeek: R1

Jan 2025

DeepSeek: R1 0528

May 2025

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DeepSeek: R1

mid tier · Cross-provider

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DeepSeek: R1 0528

mid tier · Cross-provider

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek: R1

mid tier · Cross-provider

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek: R1 0528

mid tier · Cross-provider

Get a personalized recommendation All comparisons