Skip to content
AI Viewer
Model comparison Synced Apr 6, 2026

DeepSeek: R1 0528 vs Qwen: Qwen3 Max

Side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek: R1 0528 and Qwen: Qwen3 Max. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.

Verdict

strong confidence

DeepSeek: R1 0528 leads overall

DeepSeek: R1 0528 leads in price and capabilities and max output, making it the stronger choice for most workflows. Qwen: Qwen3 Max remains competitive with advantages in context window.

Best for with DeepSeek: R1 0528

Budget-conscious workflowsMulti-modal tasksLong-form content generation

Best for with Qwen: Qwen3 Max

Long document processing

Side-by-side

Technical specifications

DeepSeek: R1 0528 Qwen: Qwen3 Max
Provider DeepSeek Qwen
Input price $0.45/M $0.78/M
Output price $2/M $4/M
Context window 164K 262K
Max output 66K 33K
Capabilities
Tool useReasoning
Tool use
Released May 28, 2025 Sep 23, 2025
View DeepSeek: R1 0528 profile View Qwen: Qwen3 Max profile

Scoring breakdown

How each dimension compares

Price

DeepSeek: R1 0528 leads

DeepSeek: R1 0528

$2/M tokens

Qwen: Qwen3 Max

$4/M tokens

Context Window

Qwen: Qwen3 Max leads

DeepSeek: R1 0528

164K tokens

Qwen: Qwen3 Max

262K tokens

Capabilities

DeepSeek: R1 0528 leads

DeepSeek: R1 0528

2/4

Qwen: Qwen3 Max

1/4

Max Output

DeepSeek: R1 0528 leads

DeepSeek: R1 0528

66K tokens

Qwen: Qwen3 Max

33K tokens

Recency

DeepSeek: R1 0528

May 2025

Qwen: Qwen3 Max

Sep 2025

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DeepSeek: R1 0528

mid tier · Cross-provider

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Qwen: Qwen3 Max

mid tier · Cross-provider

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek: R1 0528

mid tier · Cross-provider

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3 Max

mid tier · Cross-provider

Get a personalized recommendation All comparisons