DeepSeek: R1 0528 vs OpenAI: o3 Mini High
Side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek: R1 0528 and OpenAI: o3 Mini High. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.
Verdict
moderate confidenceOpenAI: o3 Mini High leads overall
OpenAI: o3 Mini High leads in context window and max output, making it the stronger choice for most workflows. DeepSeek: R1 0528 remains competitive with advantages in price.
Best for with DeepSeek: R1 0528
Best for with OpenAI: o3 Mini High
Side-by-side
Technical specifications
| DeepSeek: R1 0528 | OpenAI: o3 Mini High | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | OpenAI |
| Input price | $0.45/M | $1/M |
| Output price | $2/M | $4/M |
| Context window | 164K | 200K |
| Max output | 66K | 100K |
| Capabilities | Tool useReasoning | Tool useReasoning |
| Released | May 28, 2025 | Feb 12, 2025 |
Scoring breakdown
How each dimension compares
Price
DeepSeek: R1 0528 leadsDeepSeek: R1 0528
$2/M tokens
OpenAI: o3 Mini High
$4/M tokens
Context Window
OpenAI: o3 Mini High leadsDeepSeek: R1 0528
164K tokens
OpenAI: o3 Mini High
200K tokens
Capabilities
DeepSeek: R1 0528
2/4
OpenAI: o3 Mini High
2/4
Max Output
OpenAI: o3 Mini High leadsDeepSeek: R1 0528
66K tokens
OpenAI: o3 Mini High
100K tokens
Recency
DeepSeek: R1 0528
May 2025
OpenAI: o3 Mini High
Feb 2025
Related comparisons
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DeepSeek: R1 0528
mid tier · Cross-provider
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs OpenAI: o3 Mini High
mid tier · Cross-provider
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek: R1 0528
mid tier · Cross-provider
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs OpenAI: o3 Mini High
mid tier · Cross-provider