Skip to content
AI Viewer
Model comparison Fresh data: Synced Mar 10, 2026

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.2-Codex

Side-by-side comparison of Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 and OpenAI: GPT-5.2-Codex. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.

Verdict

moderate confidence

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 leads overall

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 has a meaningful edge overall, but OpenAI: GPT-5.2-Codex is stronger in specific areas. Your use case determines the right pick.

Best for with Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6

Long-document workflowsCutting-edge features

Best for with OpenAI: GPT-5.2-Codex

Cost-conscious teams

Side-by-side

Technical specifications

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 OpenAI: GPT-5.2-Codex
Provider Anthropic OpenAI
Input price $5/M $2/M
Output price $25/M $14/M
Context window 1.0M 400K
Max output 128K 128K
Capabilities
Tool useVisionReasoning
Tool useVisionReasoning
Released Feb 4, 2026 Jan 14, 2026

Scoring breakdown

How each dimension compares

Price

OpenAI: GPT-5.2-Codex leads

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6

$5/M in / $25/M out

OpenAI: GPT-5.2-Codex

$2/M in / $14/M out

Context Window

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 leads

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6

1.0M

OpenAI: GPT-5.2-Codex

400K

Capabilities

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6

3/4 features

OpenAI: GPT-5.2-Codex

3/4 features

Max Output

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6

128K

OpenAI: GPT-5.2-Codex

128K

Release Date

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 leads

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6

Feb 4, 2026

OpenAI: GPT-5.2-Codex

Jan 14, 2026

Related comparisons

Free forever·Unsubscribe anytime·View archive