Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek: R1 0528
Side-by-side comparison of Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek: R1 0528. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.
Verdict
moderate confidenceAnthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 leads overall
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 leads in context window and capabilities, making it the stronger choice for most workflows. DeepSeek: R1 0528 remains competitive with advantages in price.
Best for with Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5
Best for with DeepSeek: R1 0528
Side-by-side
Technical specifications
| Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 | DeepSeek: R1 0528 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | DeepSeek |
| Input price | $1/M | $0.45/M |
| Output price | $5/M | $2/M |
| Context window | 200K | 164K |
| Max output | 64K | 66K |
| Capabilities | Tool useVisionReasoning | Tool useReasoning |
| Released | Oct 15, 2025 | May 28, 2025 |
Scoring breakdown
How each dimension compares
Price
DeepSeek: R1 0528 leadsAnthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5
$5/M tokens
DeepSeek: R1 0528
$2/M tokens
Context Window
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 leadsAnthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5
200K tokens
DeepSeek: R1 0528
164K tokens
Capabilities
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 leadsAnthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5
3/4
DeepSeek: R1 0528
2/4
Max Output
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5
64K tokens
DeepSeek: R1 0528
66K tokens
Recency
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5
Oct 2025
DeepSeek: R1 0528
May 2025
Related comparisons
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DeepSeek: R1 0528
mid tier · Cross-provider
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek: R1
mid tier · Cross-provider
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash
mid tier · Cross-provider
Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
mid tier · Cross-provider