Skip to content
AI Viewer
Model comparison Synced Apr 6, 2026

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) vs xAI: Grok 3 Beta

Side-by-side comparison of Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) and xAI: Grok 3 Beta. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.

Verdict

strong confidence

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) leads overall

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) leads in context window and capabilities and max output, making it the stronger choice for most workflows. xAI: Grok 3 Beta remains a solid alternative depending on your specific needs.

Best for with Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)

Long document processingMulti-modal tasksLong-form content generation

Best for with xAI: Grok 3 Beta

No clear advantages identified

Side-by-side

Technical specifications

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) xAI: Grok 3 Beta
Provider Anthropic xAI
Input price $3/M $3/M
Output price $15/M $15/M
Context window 200K 131K
Max output 64K N/A
Capabilities
Tool useVisionReasoning
Tool use
Released Feb 24, 2025 Apr 9, 2025

Scoring breakdown

How each dimension compares

Price

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)

$15/M tokens

xAI: Grok 3 Beta

$15/M tokens

Context Window

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) leads

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)

200K tokens

xAI: Grok 3 Beta

131K tokens

Capabilities

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) leads

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)

3/4

xAI: Grok 3 Beta

1/4

Max Output

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) leads

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)

64K tokens

xAI: Grok 3 Beta

N/A

Recency

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)

Feb 2025

xAI: Grok 3 Beta

Apr 2025

Related comparisons