Skip to content
AI Viewer
Model comparison Synced Apr 6, 2026

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) vs OpenAI: o1-pro

Side-by-side comparison of Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) and OpenAI: o1-pro. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.

Verdict

strong confidence

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) leads overall

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) leads in price and capabilities, making it the stronger choice for most workflows. OpenAI: o1-pro remains competitive with advantages in max output.

Best for with Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)

Budget-conscious workflowsMulti-modal tasks

Best for with OpenAI: o1-pro

Long-form content generation

Side-by-side

Technical specifications

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) OpenAI: o1-pro
Provider Anthropic OpenAI
Input price $3/M $150/M
Output price $15/M $600/M
Context window 200K 200K
Max output 64K 100K
Capabilities
Tool useVisionReasoning
VisionReasoning
Released Feb 24, 2025 Mar 19, 2025

Scoring breakdown

How each dimension compares

Price

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) leads

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)

$15/M tokens

OpenAI: o1-pro

$600/M tokens

Context Window

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)

200K tokens

OpenAI: o1-pro

200K tokens

Capabilities

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) leads

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)

3/4

OpenAI: o1-pro

2/4

Max Output

OpenAI: o1-pro leads

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)

64K tokens

OpenAI: o1-pro

100K tokens

Recency

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)

Feb 2025

OpenAI: o1-pro

Mar 2025

Related comparisons