Skip to content
AI Viewer
Model comparison Synced Apr 6, 2026

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) vs OpenAI: GPT Audio

Side-by-side comparison of Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) and OpenAI: GPT Audio. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.

Verdict

strong confidence

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) leads overall

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) leads in context window and capabilities and max output, making it the stronger choice for most workflows. OpenAI: GPT Audio remains competitive with advantages in price.

Best for with Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)

Long document processingMulti-modal tasksLong-form content generation

Best for with OpenAI: GPT Audio

Budget-conscious workflows

Side-by-side

Technical specifications

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) OpenAI: GPT Audio
Provider Anthropic OpenAI
Input price $3/M $3/M
Output price $15/M $10/M
Context window 200K 128K
Max output 64K 16K
Capabilities
Tool useVisionReasoning
Tool useAudio
Released Feb 24, 2025 Jan 19, 2026

Scoring breakdown

How each dimension compares

Price

OpenAI: GPT Audio leads

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)

$15/M tokens

OpenAI: GPT Audio

$10/M tokens

Context Window

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) leads

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)

200K tokens

OpenAI: GPT Audio

128K tokens

Capabilities

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) leads

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)

3/4

OpenAI: GPT Audio

2/4

Max Output

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) leads

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)

64K tokens

OpenAI: GPT Audio

16K tokens

Recency

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)

Feb 2025

OpenAI: GPT Audio

Jan 2026

Related comparisons