Skip to content
AI Viewer
Model comparison Synced Apr 6, 2026

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) vs Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06

Side-by-side comparison of Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) and Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.

Verdict

strong confidence

Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 leads overall

Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 leads in price and context window and capabilities, making it the stronger choice for most workflows. Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) remains a solid alternative depending on your specific needs.

Best for with Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)

No clear advantages identified

Best for with Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06

Budget-conscious workflowsLong document processingMulti-modal tasks

Side-by-side

Technical specifications

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06
Provider Anthropic Google
Input price $3/M $1/M
Output price $15/M $10/M
Context window 200K 1.0M
Max output 64K 66K
Capabilities
Tool useVisionReasoning
Tool useVisionAudioReasoning
Released Feb 24, 2025 May 6, 2025

Scoring breakdown

How each dimension compares

Price

Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 leads

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)

$15/M tokens

Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06

$10/M tokens

Context Window

Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 leads

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)

200K tokens

Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06

1.0M tokens

Capabilities

Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 leads

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)

3/4

Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06

4/4

Max Output

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)

64K tokens

Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06

66K tokens

Recency

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)

Feb 2025

Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06

May 2025

Related comparisons