Skip to content
AI Viewer
Model comparison Synced Apr 6, 2026

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5

Side-by-side comparison of Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) and Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.

Verdict

marginal confidence

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) leads overall

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) leads in price, making it the stronger choice for most workflows. Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5 remains a solid alternative depending on your specific needs.

Best for with Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)

Budget-conscious workflows

Best for with Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5

No clear advantages identified

Side-by-side

Technical specifications

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5
Provider Anthropic Anthropic
Input price $3/M $5/M
Output price $15/M $25/M
Context window 200K 200K
Max output 64K 64K
Capabilities
Tool useVisionReasoning
Tool useVisionReasoning
Released Feb 24, 2025 Nov 24, 2025

Scoring breakdown

How each dimension compares

Price

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking) leads

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)

$15/M tokens

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5

$25/M tokens

Context Window

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)

200K tokens

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5

200K tokens

Capabilities

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)

3/4

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5

3/4

Max Output

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)

64K tokens

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5

64K tokens

Recency

Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking)

Feb 2025

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5

Nov 2025

Related comparisons