Skip to content
AI Viewer
Model comparison Synced Apr 5, 2026

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Side-by-side comparison of Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.

Verdict

strong confidence

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads overall

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads in price and context window and capabilities and max output, making it the stronger choice for most workflows. Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet remains a solid alternative depending on your specific needs.

Best for with Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet

No clear advantages identified

Best for with Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Budget-conscious workflowsLong document processingMulti-modal tasksLong-form content generation

Side-by-side

Technical specifications

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Provider Anthropic Google
Input price $6/M $2/M
Output price $30/M $12/M
Context window 200K 1.0M
Max output 8K 66K
Capabilities
Tool useVision
Tool useVisionAudioReasoning
Released Oct 21, 2024 Feb 19, 2026

Scoring breakdown

How each dimension compares

Price

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet

$30/M tokens

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

$12/M tokens

Context Window

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet

200K tokens

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

1.0M tokens

Capabilities

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet

2/4

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

4/4

Max Output

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet

8K tokens

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

66K tokens

Recency

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Oct 2024

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Feb 2026

Related comparisons