Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 Thinking
Side-by-side comparison of Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku and MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 Thinking. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.
Verdict
strong confidenceAnthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku leads overall
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku leads in context window and max output, making it the stronger choice for most workflows. MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 Thinking remains competitive with advantages in price.
Best for with Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku
Best for with MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 Thinking
Side-by-side
Technical specifications
| Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku | MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 Thinking | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Kimi / Moonshot AI |
| Input price | $0.80/M | $0.47/M |
| Output price | $4/M | $2/M |
| Context window | 200K | 131K |
| Max output | 8K | N/A |
| Capabilities | Tool useVision | Tool useReasoning |
| Released | Nov 3, 2024 | Nov 6, 2025 |
Scoring breakdown
How each dimension compares
Price
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 Thinking leadsAnthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku
$4/M tokens
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 Thinking
$2/M tokens
Context Window
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku leadsAnthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku
200K tokens
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 Thinking
131K tokens
Capabilities
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku
2/4
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 Thinking
2/4
Max Output
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku leadsAnthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku
8K tokens
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 Thinking
N/A
Recency
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku
Nov 2024
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 Thinking
Nov 2025
Related comparisons
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DeepSeek: R1
mid tier · Cross-provider
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DeepSeek: R1 0528
mid tier · Cross-provider
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash
mid tier · Cross-provider
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
mid tier · Cross-provider