Skip to content
AI Viewer
Model comparison Synced Apr 6, 2026

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)

Side-by-side comparison of Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku and Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview). Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.

Verdict

strong confidence

Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) leads overall

Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) leads in price and max output, making it the stronger choice for most workflows. Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku remains competitive with advantages in context window.

Best for with Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku

Long document processing

Best for with Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)

Budget-conscious workflowsLong-form content generation

Side-by-side

Technical specifications

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)
Provider Anthropic Google
Input price $0.80/M $0.50/M
Output price $4/M $3/M
Context window 200K 66K
Max output 8K 66K
Capabilities
Tool useVision
VisionReasoning
Released Nov 3, 2024 Feb 26, 2026

Scoring breakdown

How each dimension compares

Price

Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) leads

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku

$4/M tokens

Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)

$3/M tokens

Context Window

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku

200K tokens

Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)

66K tokens

Capabilities

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku

2/4

Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)

2/4

Max Output

Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) leads

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku

8K tokens

Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)

66K tokens

Recency

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku

Nov 2024

Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)

Feb 2026

Related comparisons