Skip to content
AI Viewer
Model comparison Synced Apr 6, 2026

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DeepSeek: R1 0528

Side-by-side comparison of Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku and DeepSeek: R1 0528. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.

Verdict

strong confidence

DeepSeek: R1 0528 leads overall

DeepSeek: R1 0528 leads in price and max output, making it the stronger choice for most workflows. Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku remains competitive with advantages in context window.

Best for with Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku

Long document processing

Best for with DeepSeek: R1 0528

Budget-conscious workflowsLong-form content generation

Side-by-side

Technical specifications

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku DeepSeek: R1 0528
Provider Anthropic DeepSeek
Input price $0.80/M $0.45/M
Output price $4/M $2/M
Context window 200K 164K
Max output 8K 66K
Capabilities
Tool useVision
Tool useReasoning
Released Nov 3, 2024 May 28, 2025

Scoring breakdown

How each dimension compares

Price

DeepSeek: R1 0528 leads

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku

$4/M tokens

DeepSeek: R1 0528

$2/M tokens

Context Window

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku

200K tokens

DeepSeek: R1 0528

164K tokens

Capabilities

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku

2/4

DeepSeek: R1 0528

2/4

Max Output

DeepSeek: R1 0528 leads

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku

8K tokens

DeepSeek: R1 0528

66K tokens

Recency

Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku

Nov 2024

DeepSeek: R1 0528

May 2025

Related comparisons